Lorenzo 1ġItalian Group For Lap Band Città della Scienza, Naples Italyīackground Aim of this study is the retrospective multicenter analysis of the results of perigastric and pars flaccida band positioning. Di Lorenzo (University of Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy)Ĭo-authors: N. O-002 Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding via Pars Flaccida vs Perigastric Positioning. Incompetence may need another intervention. If this finding can be confirmed, patients with LES Patients with an incompetent LES on manometry had a higher
PH monitoring and endoscopy do not predict outcome of gastric bandingĪnd have therefore no relevance in selecting patients for gastricīanding. 14.7%, p = 0.01), especially if the band was placed
Presence of an incompetent lowerĮsophageal sphincter (LES) led to reoperation in a greater number of Monitoring and endoscopic findings were not predictive for the Endoscopic evaluation revealedĮsophagitis in 10.3% and hiatal hernia in 33.8%. The differences in weight loss, complications and reoperation rate were retrospectively compared.Ĩ.2% of the patients had a non-specific motility disorder of theĮsophagus, 44.3% had an incompetent sphincter on manometry, and 17.5% Methods 68 bariatric patients had esophageal manometry, endoscopy and pH monitoring. The results of preoperative upper gastrointestinal (GI) testing and the
Sphincter play a role in the development of complications. It is not known whether esophageal motility or the lower esophageal Long-term complications after laparoscopic gastric banding (LAGB) areįrequent and lead to reoperations in a substantial number of patients. Bloom 1ġImperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, Department of Investigative Medicine London United Kingdom 2Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial Kidney and Transplant Institute London United Kingdom Bueter (Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom)Ĭo-authors: M. O-001 Upper Gastrointestinal Investigations Before Gastric Banding
0 kommentar(er)
